Story and Photos by Stephen Glenn
The reputation of the Citroen SM precedes most of our actual knowledge of the car itself. Frighteningly complex hydraulics, rusty uni-bodies, electrical gremlins and unobtanium parts all immediately come to mind when considering the car. While these descriptors can apply to many cars, they are particularly associated with Citroens here in the States.
It is only upon careful consideration of the SM, its historical place and technological sophistication that one begins to truly appreciate its qualities.
When Jerry Hathaway of SM World remarked about a SM he had recently sold to a M.I.T. Professor: “he had the brains to buy the best he could afford” it wasn’t totally clear whether he meant that particular example or a SM in general.
For the SM is a thinking man’s car. And a technological tour de force. Aesthetically pleasing in its Gallic way, from the exterior it is far removed from its obvious sporting competitors, the V12 Lamborghini Espada, Maserati Bora and Aston Martin DBS. Contemporary road tests typically mentioned the Mercedes and BMW models of its day, but these cars have long faded in comparison, with the SM remaining an icon of its era.
Jerry was a front-end mechanic in 1972 at Irv White Buick in Los Angeles when the dealership began carrying the SM. Citroën had plenty at stake with the SM and dealers had to meet certain presentation standards. This meant forsaking Charlie Dirscherl’s nearby Challenger Motors in Hollywood, which had been importing Citroëns since before WWII, for the modern showroom of Irv White. After seven long years of lucrative, but routine, work Jerry was ready for a challenge. The SM with its complex hydraulics immediately captivated him.
In 1974 Jerry left Irv White for an independent shop where he was only going to work on Citroëns. When this didn’t work to his satisfaction, he opened his own shop on Sepulveda Boulevard in Van Nuys in 1976. In 1992 Jerry relocated the business to Santa Clarita. Now over thirty years later, he focuses exclusively on SMs at his shop SM World, just off the Interstate 5, north of Los Angeles.
According to Brian Long & Philippe Claverol in their book entitled: “SM, Citroën’s Maserati-engined Supercar” Citroën had been working on developing a luxury touring car since the early 1960’s. When Citroën bought Maserati in 1968, they gained access to the final piece required, a 2.7L 90-degree V6. The pollination worked both ways with Citroën receiving power plants and Maserati, hydraulic technology. This Maserati would apply to the Merak, Khamsin & Bora. Not surprisingly the Merak hydraulic pump is the same as that in the SM, and the Citroën DS pump was used in the Khamsin and Bora.
The Maserati engine originally displaced 2.7L with 170 hp and was installed in the 1971 through mid-1973 cars (SB chassis prefix). In 1973, the engine displacement was increased to 3L for the duration of the production run (SD chassis prefix). This engine produced 180 hp, but more importantly torque was up.
While the 2.7L engine was relatively robust, the 3L engine consumed oil in large quantities from new. Jerry relates the story of customers bringing in their new SMs for the 6,000 mile oil change with only half a quart remaining in the sump. The cast iron oil rings wore quickly and soon the engines were consuming eight quarts every 3,000 miles. Typically this showed up as extensive engine-bearing wear by 50K-60K miles. When rebuilt with standard US 3-piece oil rings, the consumption drops to minimal and most cars today have been so retro-fitted.
Total SM production numbered 12,920 cars with 1,729 arriving in the US by 1973. In the latter part of that year, DOT regulations changed and the balance of the cars originally destined for the US ended up in Japan. Japan typically received Euro-spec cars but for these approximately 300 U.S.-spec cars. World wide, SM production ran from 1971 to 1975. By 1975 the oil crisis had killed most luxury car sales and the SM was no exception.
Designed as a four-seater Grand Tourer, the SM’s rear seats are impractical for most adults. Or at least four super-sized Americans. Yet at sixteen feet in length it is a substantially-sized two-seater. Again quoting Long & Claverol, contemporary road testers gave the car high praise for its comfortable ride, positive but light self-centering steering and the engine’s peppy performance. Opinions on the clutch appeared to vary depending on whether the reviewer viewed the car as a gran boulevardier or sportscar.
Performance was sufficient to support either view. Top speed was quoted at 135 mph although there were reports of unmodified 150 mph speeds. Jerry broke 200 mph in his modified SM race-car at Bonneville. The low CD of 0.33 allowed a stock 0-60 time of around nine seconds. Riding in a 5-spd version recently, the car kept up easily with modern traffic while the engine throbbed merrily away.
Then there is the question of styling. It’s one of those – you either love it or hate it. With the return of the 70’s in fashion & style, the car looks quite hip once again. The overall shape, enclosed nose and wheel spats combine to make the car appear futuristically aero. Jerry reports that a significant number of current SM owners are pilots, both private and commercial. Whether it’s the feel of the controls, the streamlined shape or both that attracts them, he wasn’t sure. Or perhaps it’s the cost of owning one.
SMs never were inexpensive with US list prices in excess of $13,000 by 1973. While appearing relatively insignificant in today’s dollars, consider that in 1974 Jerry took $10,000 he had saved towards buying a new SM and bought a $33,000 house in Granada Hills instead. Current prices remain strong with good examples trading from the high $20K’s and up. It’s not uncommon for an excellent car to bring upward of $50,000. This appears to be a great deal when one considers that it can cost $80K – $90K to do a full restoration.
Individual parts and the associated repair work can be expensive – Jerry recommends buying the best one that you can afford and making sure that it is fully checked out by someone who works on the cars frequently – before buying it.
Regular maintenance is critical with the suspension spheres having a life expectancy of five years, the pressure regulator and brake accumulators six years and the cylinder boots only three to four years. Old age is the enemy of these cars, which coupled with the maintenance of the hydraulic system makes a caring owner essential.
With that, the SM can be tremendously reliable and trouble free. Jerry once bought a 230,000 mile car, changed the oil, lubed it and promptly drove it to Spokane, non-stop. All he carried was a spare distributor cap, which no SM owner should ever leave home without, and the long screwdriver required to change it.
For the selective few, the SM remains one of the world’s foremost GT cars. Excellent performance, futuristic styling and bar-setting technical specifications combine to create an unforgettable experience.
D E Sailors says
Hello!
Interesting article on one of my favorite cars!
Thanks!
Best regards!
Dale
Jim Bandy says
Sirs,
First, “Frightingly complex” suspension system…hummm They had the system since l954, and all aircraft use a similar system, now would you want to still ave Conastoga Wagon system still on your car?? Small refences in the artricle suggest that “I” do not like the car and/or anything French. There seems to be a bisas towards anyting not English/German and/or Italian, now great items have came for the UK/Deutschland/Italy, but anything out of the ordinary..then it must be French! And this is just crazy. Jerry’s in one great icon of the SM, he knows and does. Also the Professor of MIT, meant the SM’s in General.
As to the design, “Architecture Journals” have listed the SM as the most/best automobile design in 100 years…..And no bias from that melieu…they’re not necessarily auto people….
Jim Bandy says
et al,
The professor at Havard meant…SM’s in general…Again, seems like in the article a little bias against anyting French… Jerry is one great icon of the SM, he knows…
Design is one of the best, “Architect Journals” have listed it as the best design in the last 100 years…nuff said.
Wallace Wyss says
I was at Motor Trend when the SM got selected to be car of the year.Instead of being grateful and rewarding us with lots of pages of color ads, the chinsy distributor bought a half page black and white ad. The editor, Eric Dahlquist, soon left the company. I wasn’t allowed to drive it, though the nominees were supposed to be driven by the whole staff. Supposedly it was because “the steering was wierd.” I applaud the magazine staff for selecting a car not on the basis of ads, too bad that we got punished for it…
Nick says
I was never a big fan of Citroen but driving the SM was an experience unlike any other. Yes, it isn’t Italian, or German or English but it is very definitively French, something most people just don’t get. French cars have a difference essence and cannot be compared to others, as much as Italian cannot be compared to German, etc.
The SM has to be the most “modern” car I have ever driven. Yes, it’s performance are of yester-years but the feel is indescribable. The inside is closer to a rendition of the Jetson’s than any other cars, the feel is luxurious, especially considering the period. The seat are downright comfortable and I could see myself driving long hours… if the car would make it.
There are oddities, the break pedal is really a sensor push button and requires some getting use to. The stick shift is no quick selector, but then again, the car is more of a highway cruiser than anything.
All in all, I was greatly impressed with this car. I loved the futuristic look and feel of it and being a Sci Fi fan, the body design did it for me, especially the back. Why didn’t I buy it? Lack of spare parts and frighteningly expensive engine rebuild make this car a true enthusiast item only. I feel you just can’t get it unless you drive it with an open mind and put it into context.
I say well played by Citroen. Too bad they never refined it.
Nick
Ron Kloetzli says
After admiring that car for years and years I finally owned one for several years in the early 90’s. I will agree with the above comments but I really don’t have much respect for the Maserati engine. It was barely adequate in performance and poorly designed for reliability. The cam chains with their minimal contact wrap on the sprockets were especially poor design. Contemporary Ferraris were far better.
I loved everything about the body aesthetics and chassis but often wondered if one could install a Ferrari 328 engine in there. It would be an engineering challenge, but would complete the original SM concept to perfection.
Boo says
I miss my SMs. They were all lost when a neighbor was getting ready to sell his house and had the city “cleanse” the neighborhood of all unused cars. Mine were behind my house and surrounded by six foot high fence panels in addition to the six foot high privacy fence of my back yard.
They, and my DS station wagon and DSpecial, had to be moved to a relative’s friend’s farm, where a grass fire destroyed the lot.
My house was broken into while I was out west and most of my Citroen parts stolen by drug addicts seeking metal to sell for scrap. The Maserati engine under rebuilding, two SM 5 speed transaxles, three Diravi steering gears, a pair of brandnew rear disc rotors, clutch pressure plate assemblies both new and used, and hundreds of other parts were stolen. About all I had left was a set of Webers, five SM radiators, a DS crossflow radiator and a pair of headlight cover glasses. The DS airconditioning set – the one with the two condensers and fans just in front of the front wheels: gone.
The SM was the most enjoyable car to drive of any I have ever driven. Once on the highway, one “thought” it around curves – only barely perceptible movement of the wheel. The Lumenition electronic ignition replacing the original points made for consistently smoother idling (never a plus of the SM), even acceleration and no more backfiring, something I was never able to eliminate with the standard ignition. New points, rotor, condensers, cap helped but never lasted. The ignition required occasional “fiddling” to keep the timing and dwell right-on, which is essential to smooth running. The backfiring as the engine came to a stop is suspected as a cause of the loss of the “mousetrap” main timing chain slack take-up, by causing a reverse rotation of the crankshaft as it came to a stop. I never had such a failure but it was mentioned in the literature.