Ferrari Win/Lose
by Philippe Defechereux
Photos courtesy and copyright Planet F1
During Friday’s qualifying practice at Hockenheim, as well as Saturday’s qualifying, Ferrari dominated the pack for the first time since… the 2010 season’s first Grand Prix in Bahrain.
Vettel and his Red Bull did manage to extract the pole position in front of the two red racers, but by a mere 2/1,000 of a second! Webber was fourth on the grid, behind Alonso and Massa. It was clear the Ferraris had regained the advantage. Next came the McLaren, finally racing their own version of the blown diffuser (*), but still not fast enough to catch the reinvigorated Ferraris and the speedy Red Bullets. The mid field was composed of the usual suspects: Kubica’s Renault, the Williams and the Mercedes “Silver Arrows,” quite dented these days.
On Sunday 1 p.m. local time, all threats of rain had vanished and the sky was clear, with some patchy high cloud cover; the ambient temperature was in the seventies, which, with the grid as it stood, promised some great racing. The German public filled the stands, what with five Germans on the grid, one of them on pole. There was great hope that Rosberg and Schumacher could maybe score a spot on the podium. Hulkenberg (Williams) and Sutil (Force India) both had chances to score points. And then the five red lights holding the vrooming herd still, turned dark…
Immediately, Vettel, whose start was not as quick, veered to the right to block Alonso, squeezing the Spaniard against the pit wall. This left Massa with a broad avenue ahead of him before turn 1 and Felipe lunged for it. As the three-car sandwich got into the right turn, Vettel realized his mistake and tried to defend his left, thus freeing Alonso. A second later, the two Ferraris were ahead, with Vettel a chastised third. Worse for the Red Bull team, whose drivers keep losing the clear speed advantage of their cars with all kinds of shenanigans, Hamilton managed to wedge his McLaren ahead of Webber in the first pass around the hairpin, taking fourth before the first lap was even completed. And with that, all the hot action the 2010 German Grand Prix was to witness was over, except for the incidental fact that the two Torro Rosso drivers took each other out shortly thereafter.
Please take the time to contribute and keep VeloceToday coming to your inbox every week. It’s easy and safe. Simply click here for details. [/caption]
There would be no more drama until lap 49, other than the sad sight of Michael Schumacher once again being outraced by his teammate and, in the end, barely finishing in the points. What happened on lap 49, eighteen laps from the finish line? During the second third of the race, Massa and Alonso had traded fastest laps, and the distance between the two Ferraris had varied from one second to three seconds. It seemed Massa was firmly holding the lead, while Alonso could at least match the Brazilian’s speed. In fact Alonso had attempted a pass a few laps earlier, but Massa easily blocked him, which had the hot Spaniard exclaim “That’s ridiculous!” on the team radio. Alonso is said to be this year’s most richly paid driver, and he was 23 points ahead of Massa arriving at Hockenheim, but still far behind the McLaren and Red Bull drivers. As the laps ticked away, it became clear that the Ferrari management was deliberating whether to intervene or not (“team orders”), even though such orders are clearly prohibited by the regulations. Spectators and viewers were holding their breath.
Then, Rod Smedley, Massa’s engineer, came on the team radio to tell his driver: “Fernando is quicker. Please confirm.” Massa remained silent. But as the two red racers completed turn 6, Massa suddenly and visibly slowed down, and Alonso zoomed past him. To which Smedley told his driver “Good lad. Sorry.” Both communications from the engineer were transmitted on all world TV channels carrying the race. Massa seemed to lose his pace after the pass, surely a humiliating moment. But professional as always, he quickly regrouped and Vettel only had a fleeting hope of perhaps scoring the second spot on the podium. In the end, Alonso finished just 4.2 seconds ahead of his teammate, while Vettel was third 1.0 second behind the second Ferrari. The two McLarens finished in 4th and 5th, with Webber finishing 6th. Then came Kubica, Rosberg, Schumacher and Petrov.
And now the storm exploded. Not in the heavens, but along pit lane, in the paddock and in the press rooms. Even on the podium, Alonso looked subdued and Massa simply crushed. For it was also one year ago almost to the day that he had his near fatal encounter at high speed with a two pound spring that had gotten loose from the preceding Brawn GP car and hit his helmet at eye level. It took him six months to recover, and a win on that anniversary would have been a triumph for the man and for his team. Instead, Ferrari’s arrogance and ”above the rule” mentality, ruined a one-two “come-back” victory and quickly turned it into a P.R. disaster. Soon after the interviews were completed, indeed, the team principals were called into the steward’s office. Despite their denials, they were quickly charged with having contravened Article 39.1 of the Formula 1 Sporting Regulations, which states that ”team orders which interfere with a race result are prohibited,” as well as with a breach of article 151c of the FIA International Sporting Code, which covers “any fraudulent conduct, or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition or to the interests of motor sport generally.” They were also fined $100,000 and referred to the FIA’s World Council for “further consideration.” In the interim, the results and points won will stand.
We can be sure that the controversy and the arguments have only begun to unfold. What would have been a joyous and triumphal day for Ferrari was incredibly turned into a double black eye: not only did the Maranello team blatantly contravene the sporting regulations, but they thought they would get away with it. In fact, during the post-podium interviews, Alonso pretended he knew nothing about team orders and just thought Massa had “missed a gear” going into turn 6. Team manager Domenicali spun the same tale, apparently unaware that the whole world had heard his engineer’s barely concealed “team orders.” For the viewing public, which is funding the whole Formula 1 circus, this is treason. They pay to watch racing, not arbitrary manipulation. One key question is: “If Alonso was so much faster than Massa, how come he could not pass him?” For ‘passing’ is what racing is all about. And in fact, after the first lap, the whole German Grand Prix became processional. It would have been nice to see Alonso earn his extra 7 points. Yes, 7 points (out of 200 still to be won in the rest of the season) is what motivated the red team to put themselves in this sorry situation. Pride comes before the fall, as they say.
(*) After the race to fit “F-ducts” into their new cars, the next technological advance, introduced by Red Bull earlier this season, is the “blown diffuser.” It requires repositioning the exhaust pipes from blowing their hot gases upward above the gearbox at the rear of the car, to below the car, around the gearbox and into the double diffuser. This, whenever the throttle is active, increases the airflow going through the diffuser significantly enough to gain up to 9 mph in fast corners. There are two great challenges facing those wishing to adapt this new concept to cars that were not designed in advance around it: first, every car has a different chassis and rear suspension design, and rerouting the whole exhaust system from top to bottom, literally, is not easily done and more difficult for some than others; second, the exhaust temperature reaches up to 600º F, meaning totally new materials are needed for the diffuser. Red Bull had the lead advantage; Ferrari has clearly caught up now; McLaren and Mercedes-Benz are still struggling. The rest of the field is way behind. What will be the next breakthrough? That’s two big ones in just one half season. The arms race in F1 is fast accelerating. This one is not processional.
Race Results
1 | ALONSO | Ferrari | 1h27m38.864s |
2 | MASSA | Ferrari | + 4.1s |
3 | VETTEL | RBR-Renault | + 5.1s |
4 | HAMILTON |
McLaren-Mercedes | + 26.8s |
5 | BUTTON | McLaren-Mercedes | + 29.4s |
6 | WEBBER | RBR-Renault | + 43.6s |
7 | KUBICA | Renault | + 1 lap |
8 | ROSBERG | Mercedes GP | + 1 lap |
9 | SCHUMACHER | Mercedes GP | + 1 lap |
10 | PETROV | Renault | + 1 lap |
11 | KOBAYASHI | BMW Sauber-Ferrari | + 1 lap |
12 | BARRICHELLO | Williams-Cosworth | + 1 lap |
13 | HULKENBERG | Williams-Cosworth | + 1 lap |
14 | DE LA ROSA | BMW Sauber-Ferrari | + 1 lap |
15 | ALGUERSUARI | STR-Ferrari | + 1 lap |
16 | LIUZZI | Force India-Mercedes | + 2 laps |
17 | SUTIL | Force India-Mercedes | + 2 laps |
18 | GLOCK | Virgin-Cosworth | + 3 laps |
19 | SENNA | HRT-Cosworth | + 4 laps |
20 | KOVALAINEN | Lotus-Cosworth | + 11 laps, accident damage |
21 | DI GRASSI | Virgin-Cosworth | + 17 laps, suspension |
22 | YAMAMOTO | HRT-Cosworth | + 48 laps, mechanical |
23 | TRULLI | Lotus-Cosworth | + 64 laps, gearbox |
24 | BUEMI | STR-Ferrari | + 66 laps, accident damage |
Fastest Lap | VETTEL | RBR-Renault | 1m15.824s |
Driver’s Championship Standings
1 | HAMILTON | McLaren-Mercedes | 157 Points |
2 | BUTTON | McLaren-Mercedes | 143 Points |
3 | WEBBER | RBR-Renault | 136 Points |
4 | VETTEL | RBR-Renault | 136 Points |
5 | ALONSO | Ferrari | 123 Points |
6 | ROSBERG | Mercedes GP | 94 Points |
7 | KUBICA | Renault | 89 Points |
8 | MASSA | Ferrari | 85 Points |
9 | SCHUMACHER | Mercedes GP | 38 Points |
10 | STUIL | Force India-Mercedes | 35 Points |
11 | BARRICHELLO | Williams-Cosworth | 29 Points |
12 | KOBAYASHI | BMW Sauber-Ferrari | 15 Points |
13 | LIUZZI | Force India-Mercedes | 12 Points |
14 | PETROV | Renault | 7 Points |
15 | BUEMI | STR-Ferrari | 7 Points |
16 | ALGUERSUARI | STR-Ferrari | 3 Points |
17 | HULKENBERG | Williams-Cosworth | 2 Points |
Constructor’s Championship Standings
1 | McLAREN-MERCEDES | 300 Points |
2 | RBR-RENAULT | 272 Points |
3 | FERRARI | 208 Points |
4 | MERCEDES GP | 132 Points |
5 | RENAULT | 96 Points |
6 | FORCE INDIA-MERCEDES | 47 Points |
7 | WILLIAMS-COSWORTH | 31 Points |
8 | BMW SAUBER-FERRARI | 15 Points |
9 | STR-FERRARI | 10 Points |
anatoly arutunoff says
What a nerve!”Team orders” are part of the bedrock of racing for a championship!l What does Philippe, who at best is a “company man” and at worst..well, never mind… and who wrote this screed think of Brooks handing his WHOLE EFFING CAR to Fangio during the race so Fangio could win another title? Like Bobby Jones said, “money will ruin sport;” and to carry the concept further, so do “championships.” Does golf award a trophy at the end of the year to whoever accrued the most “points?” And points are another pile of crap: average finishing position reveals the better drivers–let ’em discard their worst two or three races, then add ’em up, divide by the number of races, and there you are. Screw commercialism! The only good thing about the depression of the ’30s is that it gave the US the Indy “junkyard formula” Wide Tires Ruined Racing! Strong letter to follow.
George says
Rubbish! From my vantage point, it seemed that Alonso was clearly faster. Your whole perception is flawed. Team orders are a part of EVERY team sport. They have always been a part of Formula 1. Just because some ninny at the FIA says “you can’t” is just ludicrous. They all still do it. The only teams that say that they don’t are the ones that never have a reason to.
Does everyone in baseball call “foul” when a player is told to “sacrifice bunt” to advance team mates around the diamond? No. Does everyone in the cycling world cry “foul” when a team mate helps his leader by allowing a tow. No. I see no black eye for Ferrari for this. Other things, yes, but not this.
Ed Yates says
Ah! Just like the old days when, even though he never attended a race, THE OLD MAN was in total control of the team and the drivers. At Ferrari some things never change.
Jim Brown says
Not positive without looking it up but I belive is was Peter Collins that turned the car over to Fangio.
pete says
Jim,
You are correct. It was Collins and the year was 1956. Philippe had the misfortune to wake up Toly, but at least we know that he is still vertical and complaining.
Pete
pete says
Toly, you should have mentioned your book, which is still selling like, well, selling on our site. For readers who want a great read of an interesting life, Toly’s autobiography is tops. It’s called ““One Off” just like Toly.
Ahmed Ginnah says
Any and every team sport has team orders, no matter how you apply them or how you benefit from them. So is it in Formula One, a team sport. Some F1 teams apply team orders differently, simply by “delaying” one driver by a few seconds in the pits so that the “favoured driver” “overtakes the pitted driver while he is still in the pits. Some tell driver “A” to save fuel and Not the other driver “B”. Some Championship leading F1 teams, although DO NOT approve of Ferrari’s “tactics” will have to succumb to this present hype known as “Team Order”. Lets wait and see how the Mclarens and the Red Bulls fare in future until and unless THERE ARE NO TEAM ORDERS in their respective teams , whilst the team that puts all its money on one PRANCING HORSE steals the show and maybe the championship. Time will tell!!!!!!!
John Boskovic says
But yet Red Bull taking the only extant new and improved front wing from Webber’s car and placing it on Vettel’s at the last race is not a team order that attempts to manipulate a race result?
Team orders can manifest themselves in many different ways. Attempting to legislate them out of the sport will be about as successful as the attempts to slow the cars down and improve passing by limiting aero. That has worked out pretty well…
John
Peter Hunter says
True fact. All teams control their drivers and team orders are the norm and have been since day dot. However, one must query the thinking of the team with this move. It appears the cars are performing better and with nearly half the season to go there’s an excellent chance that Alonso will catch those in front regardless of the result of this race. Surely by playing up the 1 year anniversary of Massa’s accident and a 1-2 result for the Scuderia, the publicity would have been all positive, the sport would have looked much better, (have you seen a sadder podium and press conference?) and the only person who might have had a gripe would have been Alonso. I believe (perhaps naively) that Jean Todt might not have taken the same action.