By Gijbsert-Paul Berk
Established in 1899 and based in Wolverhampton UK, Sunbeam was known for its sturdy but unexciting line of cars. Things changed in 1909 when Louis Hervé Coatalen (1879 -1962) became chief engineer. He was born in Brittany (France) but since 1900 had been employed by various car manufacturers in England. During WWI he worked on British aircraft engines. Almost as if to serve notice of his arrival, in 1910 Coatalen created the 4.2 liter streamlined Brooklands racer dubbed the “Nautilus”. He drove it himself to a number of victories at the famous track. By 1913, Coatalen had obtained one of the seminal DOHC Grand Prix Peugeots and in 1914 Sunbeam produced a race car very similar to the famous Peugeot. The first DOHC six was introduced by Sunbeam at Indy in 1916 and finished third. During the war Sunbeam produced aero engines based on their 1914 DOHC design.Of interest to Ferrari historians, Sunbeam reportedly produced the first V12 automobile in March 1914, setting records at Brooklands. But they sold the design to “a famous motorcar manufacturing firm” which was assumed to be Packard.*
In 1920 the British Sunbeam company and the French manufacturers Darracq and Talbot merged to form the S.T.D. group (Sunbeam, Talbot, Darracq), and the firm embarked upon a successful Grand Prix program.
Coatalen designed a new racing car with a 3 liter, eight cylinder engine, that made its first appearance during the 1921 Easter meeting at Brooklands. Driven by Henry Segrave it won the 3 liter Scratch Race. Coatalen then planned to enter seven of these cars in the first post-war Grand Prix at Le Mans on July 1921.
Unfortunately a coal strike in Britain prevented the two cars that were built in Sunbeam’s experimental department at Wolverhampton to participate. But the cars that were prepared in the French works at Suresnes (near Paris), did compete. They were driven by André Dubonnet, André Boillot, Kenelm Lee Guinnes, Henry Segrave and René Thomas. Although four of them finished, they were plagued by mishaps and could not beat the Duesenberg of winner Jimmy Murphy, or the Ballots of Ralph De Palma and Jules Goux that took second and third place.
The opportunity for revenge would come two years later with the 1923 French Grand Prix at Tours. But first the cars went back to the factory to be completely rebuilt and fitted with a new engine to comply with the latest (1922) rules for Grand Prix cars that limited their capacity to two liters. Coatalen engaged the Italian ex-Fiat engineer Vincenzo Bertarione and his assistant Walter Beccia, who designed a new six-in-line DOHC machine with a bore and stroke of 67 x 94 mm, aluminum pistons and a chrome-nickel crankshaft running on seven ball bearings. An engine that in technical details resembled those of Fiat (this was the reason some journalist called the Sunbeam the green Fiat) but proved to be reliable and capable of winning. The car was a great personal triumph for Louis Coatalen.
*The Classis Twin Cam Engine, Borgeson, Dalton Watson 2002
Please Donate or become a premium subscriber; only your support will keep these articles coming to you every week!
In the early twenties Voisin was a relative newcomer in the auto industry. But Gabriel Voisin (1880 –1973) had already made his mark as an aviation pioneer and a creative designer of aircraft. From 1914 till the armistice in 1918, the Voisin factory in Issy-les-Moulineaux had become one of France’s major manufacturers of military aircraft.
It was more or less by chance he decided to switch to the production of automobiles. This happened because Ernest Artault and Louis Dufresne, the latter a former Panhard engineer, offered him the drawings and prototypes of a car they had designed at the request of André Citroën. Citroën had let Voisin know that he was no longer interested in the prototype of a luxurious automobile, as he intended to mass-produce a more popular and cheaper car. Citroën also disliked the sleeve valve engine based on the Knight principle. However, Gabriel Voisin liked the design and early in 1919 the first cars to bear the name Avions Voisin left the factory.
Voisin and his staff gradually improved their construction to comply with his own ideas and his knowledge and experience as an aircraft designer. This bore results. Within a few years Voisin cars earned a reputation for being smooth, safe and fast. Voisins also began to win in racing events. Their biggest success came in the 1922 Grand Prix de Tourisme de L’ACF in Strasbourg, where three C3 S models took the first three places. The cars had been built and prepared by the so called ‘Laboratoire’, the small research and development department that Gabriel Voisin had established for his factory in 1917. Its chief engineer was André Lefebvre, a young aviation engineer. (read book review)
The rules for the 1922 Grand Prix de Tourisme specified that the coachwork of the participating cars had to be at least 130 cm wide at the height of the front seats. Gabriel Voisin found this ridiculous and fitted his cars with an open four-seater body which was only 90 cm wide, but had 20 cm deep cigar-shaped bulges at both sides. This reduced the frontal area (air resistance) while still respecting the regulations. The race organizers had to accept his entries but were not pleased. As a result the rules for the 1923 Grand Prix prescribed specific dimensions for the touring car bodies, in order to avoid clever interpretations with the objective to reduce aerodynamic drag.
When these regulations were published by the ACF at the end of December 1922, Voisin exploded in anger, because his company was already preparing the same cars for the 1923 season, shaving away some kilograms here and there and changing the shape of the mudguards to improve their aerodynamics. He wrote a sarcastic ‘open’ letter to the ACF, denouncing its attitudes to progress in automobile design. In the same letter he announced that he would not start in the touring car race, but would instead engage four cars in the Grand Prix de Vitesse.
This impulsive reaction was of course complete ‘stupidity’, as Voisin would later confess in his autobiography Mes 1001 Voitures . Because the race was scheduled for the beginning of July, this gave them just five months to build four racing cars from scratch. Voisin did not even have a two-liter engine!
Fortunately Marius Bernard – his engine expert – was already working on a new 1,328 liter four-cylinder engine for the Voisin C4. It would have a bore of 62 mm and a stroke of 110 mm. Gabriel Voisin decided that by adding two cylinders, with the same bore and slightly reduced stroke, they could make a six-cylinder with a cubic capacity of exactly 1,984 liters. The trio of Voisin, Bernard and Lefebvre (who as project manager was responsible for the construction of the car) knew that their competitors – whose engines had poppet valves and overhead camshafts – could count on higher revs and thus more power than their own sleeve valve machines could deliver. The only way to compensate for this handicap was to reduce to a minimum both the weight and aerodynamic drag of their racers. Voisin and Lefebvre – both experienced aircraft designers – used every trick in their book.
The C6 Course or ‘Laboratoire,’ as it later became known, was designed like the fuselage of an airplane. It had no conventional chassis, but was in fact one of the earliest racing cars with a monocoque construction; a box made up from a light ash frame, covered with aluminum panels and a flat aluminum under shield. This structure, with some steel and wooden reinforcements, supported all the mechanical parts such as the engine, transmission and front and rear suspensions. Its width was dictated by the requirement that the cockpit should offer enough space for the driver and a riding mechanic. The tail was long and tapered with the rear wheels inboard, within the contours of the coachwork. The whole body looked somewhat like an aircraft without wings and the layout with its narrow rear track resembled more that of a Morgan three-wheeler than of a modern – by 1923 standards – racing car.
After a lot of experimenting, Lefebvre found that a rear track of 75 cm combined with a front track to 145 cm provided sufficient stability and since the car still handled well in corners, he could save weight by leaving out the differential gears. The rear axle housing, containing only the crown and pinion wheel, was made from aluminum and was suspended on two quarter elliptic leaf springs. The front axle rested on half elliptic leaf springs and also had large friction shock absorbers.
Lefebvre and his mécanos worked day and night to get four cars ready for the race, systematically testing and improving every detail. They mounted magnesium pistons and provisions were made to keep the temperature of the cylinder heads down and to prevent the sleeve valves from seizing, even if this meant greater tolerances and therefore an increase of oil consumption. Engine cooling was a thermo-syphon system aided by a small water pump driven by a tiny air propeller above the radiator. Bench testing showed that, with the two big Zenith 36 HK carburetors, some 80 bhp was available at 4800 rpm.
However, Gabriel Voisin instructed the drivers not to exceed 4000 rpm, which limited maximum power to 75 bhp, resulting in a top speed of just under 175 km/h. Not bad at all – but not enough! The Voisin were outclassed from the start by the limited power of their engines. Voisin must have realized this during the practice sessions, but he did not for one minute consider withdrawing his entry. That would have been unlike him. It seems that Gabriel Voisin was rather pleased with the achievement of André Lefebvre, his chief engineer and ‘spiritual son’. In his memoirs he wrote: “Thirteen of our competitors, some of them the greatest names in the world of speed, had bitten the dust and we were amongst the survivors.”
With hindsight, it becomes clear that the 1923 ‘Laboratoires’ were in many details a try-out for a next generation of touring sports cars that Gabriel Voisin had in mind for the 1924 Grand Prix the Tourisme.
Read Preface to this series.
Read Part 1, The Circuit of this series.
Read Part 2 the Press and Regulations of this series.
Read Part 3 Bugatti and Delage of this series
Read Part 4 Fiat and Rolland-Pilain of this series
Bill Clark says
In the picture of Bertarione and Divo, the car is the later 1926 French Talbot (or Talbot-Darracq if being raced in GB) supercharged 1.5 litre straight eight racing car and not the 1923 Tours GP Sunbeam.
Some doubt has recently been raised as to how much of this car was built at Suresnes by the alleged presence of “British” threads on some components. At a time when British Sunbeams used metric threads this is strange.
pete says
Bill,
Yes, of course you are correct about the car being a Talbot. However, the caption makes no note of the type of car.
For more about the Talbot-Darracq saga, type in Talbot-Darracq in the ‘find’ box underneath the Italian Car Fest ad in the right column.
Pete
Karl Ludvigsen says
Regarding Sunbeam’s role as the maker of the first V-12 racing car and its connections with Packard I refer my old friend G. P. Berk to my book “The V12 Engine”, which provides chapter and verse on these happenings as well as Sunbeam’s other V12 ventures, some successful and some not.