Button Wins in Downpour Malaysian Grand Prix
by Erik Nielsen
Photos courtesy and copyright Ferrari Media
I really do prefer when there is a race to write about, but
unfortunately, the powers that be decided to schedule the Malaysian Grand Prix early in the season, when we know that there is an even chance with Silverstone that it is going to rain.
And rain it did.
Noah was quoted while walking down the pit lane as “I’m still waiting on a lumber shipment and I haven’t even found the frigging elephants yet”. That said, the old adage still applies, if you want to do well in an F1 race, it is better to start from the front.
Jenson Button is causing some members of the press corps to question their logic in writing him off seasons ago. Logic still applies, he is not the greatest thing slice sliced bread, but he is in what is becoming the best car of the grid this year. Similar to certain sons of world champions in the mid 90’s when Sir Frank was at the peak of his game. And logic dictates that credit is given to Ross Brawn for coming up with the best car of the grid since he was last rendering services with Ferrari. The Englishman has either through his on effort or just his management style created a complete package that will probably win another world championship with probably a record third team as a designer.
Once the sky really opened up and the safety car came out, the
marshals ended up calling the results based on the last green flag lap and assigning half points for the top eight finishers. The conspiracy theorists were sharpening their pencils and there will be all sorts of stories towards the end of the season when people start getting eliminated from the running due to the math. Some fans will argue that the race was called due to safety. That’s fine. But then don’t award any points because the results were entirely artificial.
BMW has been critical of the teams running the diffuser this season, but with the artificial results, they should be happy with the second place that Nick Heidfeld achieved this weekend. Toyota did well with their diffusers with Glock on the last spot on the podium and Trulli making up the best of the rest. The Italian did better than Burinio, which means that even with the best car, there is some chance that not all of Brawn’s drivers can walk on water. The last three points paying slots went to Webber, Hamilton and Rosberg.
The minor news from the race is that Ferrari has admitted that they are way off the pace. The die hard tifosi have not given up, nor has Gazzetta della Sport, but pragmatists realize that this is probably not going to be the scarlet cars’ year. Excuses are being made already that the team was more focused on winning last year than developing the 2009 car. That is a red herring. The issue goes back to the teams decision to rid itself of the foreigners after Stepney-gate. When you shuffle the chairs and eliminate some of the best talent in the industry, there is going to be disappointment, even if the pope is on your side. The question becomes whether the team can recognize the mistake early or god forbid, repeat the drought of the 80s and 90s.
The major news this week is the fact that McLaren has been caught cheating. Again. The final positions were rearranged for the Australian race with Trulli getting third back after it came out that Hamilton lied to the stewards about the pass during the safety car. Sporting director Dave Ryan was suspended and then left the silver arrows team and now the team has been summoned to Paris at the end of the month to explain themselves. Enough is enough, it’s time to throw the Woking based team out of the sport for a couple of years to start
focusing on what is important in the sport. The precedent has been set with the FIA in WRC, it’s time to step up the game in F1. Besides, Mercedes is probably dying for an excuse to get out and save some money with sales well of the mark in their car business. They probably also want to limit their exposure to a team that has been caught engaging in grossly unethical behavior twice now. Not that I’m biased or anything.
The circus stays in Asia with Shanghai in two weeks. The racing may not be that interesting yet, but I do hear that popcorn futures are up.
Race Results
1 | BUTTON | Brawn-Mercedes | 55m30.622s |
2 | HEIDFELD | BMW Sauber | + 22.7s |
3 | GLOCK | Toyota | + 23.5s |
4 | TRULLI |
Toyota | + 46.1s |
5 | BARRICHELLO | Brawn-Mercedes | + 47.3s |
6 | WEBBER | RBR-Renault | + 52.3s |
7 | HAMILTON | McLaren-Mercedes | + 60.7s |
8 | ROSBERG | Williams-Toyota | + 71.5s |
9 | MASSA | Ferrari | + 76.9s |
10 | BOURDAIS | STR-Ferrari | + 102.164s |
11 | ALONSO | Renault | + 109.422s |
12 | NAKAJIMA | Williams-Toyota | + 116.130s |
13 | PIQUET | Renault | + 113.713s |
14 | RÄIKKÖNEN | Ferrari | + 142.841s |
15 | VETTEL | RBR-Renault | + 1 lap, spin |
16 | BUEMI | STR-Ferrari | + 1 lap, spin |
17 | SUTIL | Force India-Mercedes | + 1 lap |
18 | FISICHELLA | Renault | + 2 laps, spin |
19 | KUBICA | BMW Sauber | + 30 laps, engine |
20 | KOVALAINEN | McLaren-Mercedes | + 31 laps, spin |
Fastest Lap | BUTTON | Brawn-Mercedes | 1m36.641s |
NOTE: Scheduled for 56 laps but stopped early due to heavy rain. Half points awarded.
Driver’s Championship Standings
1 | BUTTON | Brawn-Mercedes | 15 Points |
2 | BARRICHELLO | Brawn-Mercedes | 10 Points |
3 | TRULLI | Toyota | 8.5 Points |
4 | GLOCK | Toyota | 8 Points |
5 | HEIDFELD | BMW Sauber | 4 Points |
6 | ALONSO | Renault | 4 Points |
7 | ROSBERG | Williams-Toyota | 3.5 Points |
8 | BUEMI | STR-Ferrari | 2 Points |
9 | WEBBER | RBR-Renault | 1.5 Points |
10 | HAMILTON | McLaren-Mercedes | 1 Point |
11 | BOURDAIS | STR-Ferrari | 1 Point |
Constructor’s Championship Standings
1 | BRAWN-MERCEDES | 25 Points |
2 | TOYOTA | 16.5 Points |
3 | BMW SAUBER | 4 Points |
4 | RENAULT | 4 Points |
5 | WILLIAMS- TOYOTA | 3.5 Points |
6 | STR-FERRARI | 3 Points |
7 | RBR-RENAULT | 1.5 Points |
8 | MCLAREN-MERCEDES | 1 Point |
Serge says
shame to the FIA…they could started the race 2 hours earlier, they would have missed the storm, only concern TV contracts worlwide
a real circus, not a circuit!!
Shame shame to all of them
Jure says
It’s Brawn, not Braun.
Richard Lane says
You prefer it when there’s a race to write about? Are you sure?
You mean like in Australia where Trulli came through to 3rd (or 4th or 3rd again) from a pit-lane start? That wasn’t reported by VeloceToday at all. Or Hamilton coming through to 4th (or 3rd, then nowhere) from 18th on the grid.
Or maybe in Malaysia, where Button pulled a pure-Schumacher move and put in 2 fastest-laps to pull ahead during the pitstop. If that had been the donkey Massa, we would no doubt be reading about ‘tactical-brilliance’.
That’s racing, and that’s what the car-enthusiast audience of Veloce Today want to read about – not these tired, adolescent jokes about “Flabio” every single week – or baseless conspiracy theories such as the one about Hamilton being promoted to 3rd just so he could defend the championship….how are you reconciling that comment with him subsequently being slung-out by the same authorities?
Those of us who have been watching F1 for a few decades realize that, yes!, the car provides a huge component of any advantage. We know Damon Hill had it and we had to watch as Schumacher ploughed into him at regular intervals to suppress it. We knew Schumacher had it later too, and because we’re motor-racing enthusiasts and not teenage-fanboys, we appreciate the engineering and organizational brilliance of Ross Brawn (not Braun) and are excited, not morose and resigned, like VT seems to be, by the changing of the guard. This is the best year for years.
Here’s a suggestion, let Larry Crane write the F1 reports – Now THAT guy can write!!
-Richard
pete says
Richard,
Thanks much for your comments–we always appreciate both pro and con emails.
Erik’s columns have always had a bit of a bite to them, but he has been
writing our F1 reports since 2002 or roughly 112 reports—rarely ever
having missed a beat. There’s a great deal to be said for that. (The Brawn
typo is my error not Erik’s).
Erik is at least one generation-maybe two, earlier than I (but then again I’ve been
following F1 since 1954), and his
writing is definitely with an attitude that today’s F1 circus often
deserves. He may not always be on the mark, but he is always snappy–
Pete Vack
Editor, VeloceToday